Search for: "Mark and Chappell Limited"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2020, 11:02 am
Pre-Christmas sleepCopyright GuestKat Thomas Key explored the IP implications behind the confrontation between Netflix and Dave Chappelle, a stand-up comedian who rose to fame with his “Chappelle’s Show” in early 2000s. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 6:32 am
Equally in the absence of any written assignment to Fresh Trading, it was clear that Deepend London remained the legal owners until the two written assignments to Chappell and then Deepend Fresh Recovery Limited. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
Fresh Trading Limited v Deepend Fresh Recovery Limited and Andrew Thomas Robert Chappell [2015] EWHC 52 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Robert Engelhart QC, is a fascinating case which has much to teach the business community and the design profession. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 11:57 am
Read the Matchroom Boxing Limited Case | “The Queen’s Gambit”, “Emma” and the changing dynamics of content creation, distribution and star power [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 11:29 am
by Dennis Crouch and Timothy Knight On February 21, 2024, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Warner Chappell Music v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 4:20 am
The Ninth Circuit has now reversed the lower court’s dismissal of the Foundation claim, ruling that the foundation had standing since it receives royalties from the copyrights held by Warner/Chappell Music and so had standing as a “real party in interest” ruling “It is undisputed that copyright ownership lies with Warner/Chappell, but just as the termination notices affect Warner/Chappell’s ownership of copyrights, they… [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
But how about trade marks, wonders Eleonora? [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
| Hospira v Genetech Mark 1, the Appeal | [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in Europe reviewed | Italian baked goods’ trade… [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:10 am
Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –-Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on Intellectual Property in… [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:25 pm
The Opening Ceremony marks the official kick-off of the Congress. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
A tale of Dudes and Smoothies Katfriend Richard Kempner discusses Fresh Trading Limited v Deepend Fresh Recovery Limited and Andrew Thomas Robert Chappell [2015] EWHC 52 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision addressing the copyright ownership in the ‘Dude’, ie the logo used on Innocent’s smoothie bottle in the past 15 years. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Little, Mark R. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
Goldston (@JamesAGoldston) (January 31, 2024) Why the ICJ Ruling Misses the Mark: Mitigating Civilian Harm With An Enemy Engaged in Human Shielding By Claire O. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 8:49 pm
Mark Dwyatt Brown v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
In this episode of Entertainment Law Update, Entertainment lawyers Gordon Firemark Tamera Bennett and Peter Kaufman review the ten most significant cases and controversies in the entertainment industry for 2013, and forecast what we’ll be seeing in 2014.. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm
Statute of Limitations and Damages Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 11:25 am
To that end, the CCB sets a limit on the amount of damages one can receive, $15,000 per infringement or $30,000 per case. [read post]
Senator Sanders’ New Resolution Could Force U.S. to Confront Any Complicity in Civilian Harm in Gaza
18 Dec 2023, 6:21 am
” (For a further discussion of Section 502B, its use, and its history, see author John Ramming Chappell’s previous Just Security article.) [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am
Mark Walsh offers a parting “view” from the courtroom for October Term 2018 for this blog. [read post]
